2.01.2005

 

this is me projecting...

why is there no for-the-ladies equivalent of playboy? i mean, seriously. there was playgirl, but it never caught on. why? it only seems fair that us womenfolk should, if we so desire, have the option to keep a stack of "totally legitimate" pr0n on, say the coffee table, or in the bathroom. for company and stuff, too, you know? only, instead of having naked bitches, it'll have lots and lots of pictures of wang. big hot sweaty man-wang. muscles a-ripplin', fondlin' their junk, etc... and of course, very interesting and informative journalism. of course.

here is what i imagine it would be like.

image removed for the love of god


are you grossed out? why? last month's centerfold was all pouring olive oil on her privates and making a "ooooh" face, is that gross?

so, is this a million dollar idea, ladies? don't we ALL secretly want to be able to ogle men (and wang, more specifically) during the downtime? what say you, superweb?


Comments:

WINNER
 
Well, umm.., playgirl still exists, so I'm not exactly sure what you're complaining about.
 
well, yeah, duh... but do you know any ladies with a subscription? i think they horribly mismarketed or something. if i remember correctly, it's full of fagabeefies. the point is, we need something USEFUL. USEFUL, man.
 
I am SO fired for looking at your blog.
 
check it, dude: www.sweetactionmag.com

its Sweet Action, porn for girls! and the boys arent beefy, theyre juuuuust they way i like 'em. theyre order-only right now, but its totally worth it.
check out the Los Angeles, issue, some of my friends are in it! hahaah.
 
They have it a Sqecial now. I'm tempted, just 'cause.

—C.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?